SMOT vs. SMLV
SMOT (VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF) and SMLV (SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOT is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while SMLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMOT returned 11.98%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for SMLV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMOT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for SMLV.
Performance
SMOT vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than SMLV's 12.88% return.
SMOT
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.04%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLV
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 6M
- 12.84%
- 1Y
- 21.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
SMOT vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 7.04% | 6.46% | 10.71% | 17.31% | 5.41% |
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 12.88% | 5.66% | 16.77% | 7.52% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOT and SMLV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SMOT and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMOT vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOT
SMLV
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Technology
SMOT
SMLV
Healthcare
SMOT
SMLV
Consumer Cyclical
SMOT
SMLV
Industrials
SMOT
SMLV
Basic Materials
SMOT
SMLV
Consumer Defensive
SMOT
SMLV
Financial Services
SMOT
SMLV
Energy
SMOT
SMLV
Utilities
SMOT
SMLV
Real Estate
SMOT
SMLV
Communication Services
SMOT
SMLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOT vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank
SMOT
SMLV
SMOT vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMOT | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 3.00 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 8.20 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOT | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SMOT vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and SMLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOT | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -42.45% | +19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -7.34% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -20.40% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -1.48% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -5.46% | +0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.68% | +0.10% |
Volatility
SMOT vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is 3.03%, while SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that SMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOT | SMLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.03% | 3.98% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 9.88% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 15.73% | -1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 18.28% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 20.95% | -2.53% |
SMOT vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOT vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison
SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than SMLV's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLV SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.35% | 2.74% | 2.68% | 2.68% | 2.40% | 2.12% | 2.47% | 2.62% | 3.15% | 7.92% | 3.04% | 2.63% |
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 1.28% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOT and SMLV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLV has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to SMOT (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs SMLV's -42.45%.
On 3-year performance, SMLV leads with 15.66% vs 11.98% for SMOT. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SMOT.
SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.28% for SMOT.
SMOT is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SMLV is Volatility Hedged Equity. SMOT tracks Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.12% for SMLV.
SMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMOT and SMLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer