SMOT vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
SMOT and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMOT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus. It was launched on Oct 4, 2022. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. Both SMOT and NLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SMOT vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMOT vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | -2.82% | 6.46% | 10.71% | 17.31% | 5.41% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 8.18% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 4.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 8.18% return.
SMOT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- 1Y
- 8.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 85.99%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMOT vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMOT vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
SMOT
NLR
SMOT vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMOT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 2.05 | -1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 2.62 | -1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.41 | -2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.40 | 8.20 | -5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 2.05 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.18 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOT and NLR is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SMOT vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, less than NLR's 2.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF | 1.41% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.36% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
SMOT vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.36% | -65.05% | +41.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.56% | -25.80% | +11.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -18.26% | +11.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.96% | -35.90% | +30.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 10.73% | -7.09% |
Volatility
SMOT vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is 4.64%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that SMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMOT | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.64% | 12.53% | -7.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.31% | 32.94% | -22.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 42.20% | -21.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 28.16% | -9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 23.38% | -4.69% |