SMOT vs. FLQM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SMOT (VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF) and FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - SMOT tracks the Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus while FLQM tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SMOT returned 11.06%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for FLQM. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SMOT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLQM.

Performance

SMOT vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOT achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 8.31% return.

SMOT

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: 8.25%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 1Y: 15.93%
• 3Y*: 11.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.83%

FLQM

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 2.11%
• 6M: 5.88%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 1Y: 13.40%
• 3Y*: 11.46%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	$7.10M	$6.47M	$6.30M
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF	$1.13M	$990.83K	$960.21K

SMOT vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF	10.51%	6.46%	10.71%	17.31%	3.85%
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	8.31%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	5.72%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOT and FLQM is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022	0.92

The correlation between SMOT and FLQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMOT vs. FLQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMOT	FLQM
Healthcare	23.6%	15.2%
Industrials	16.3%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	15.4%
Technology	10.9%	11.7%
Consumer Defensive	10.8%	8.9%
Basic Materials	9.1%	1.1%
Financial Services	8.2%	16.9%
Communication Services	3.2%	2.4%
Real Estate	2.3%	3.6%
Energy	1.8%	5.0%
Utilities	0.7%	2.1%

Return for Risk

SMOT vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMOT

SMOT Risk / Return Rank: 45
SMOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SMOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SMOT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SMOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SMOT Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 43
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMOT vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMOT	FLQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.08	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	1.71	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	1.78	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	4.93	+0.91

SMOT vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOT and FLQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMOT vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOT drawdown since its inception was -23.36%, smaller than the maximum FLQM drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOT and FLQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMOT	FLQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.36%	-37.26%	+13.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-7.57%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.36%	-19.70%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.27%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-4.85%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	2.72%	+0.01%

Volatility

SMOT vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is 4.10%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that SMOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMOT	FLQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	4.35%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.25%	9.04%	+1.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.24%	12.50%	+1.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.31%	16.46%	+1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.31%	18.40%	-0.09%

SMOT vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMOT vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

SMOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than FLQM's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.63%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%
SMOT VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF	1.24%	1.37%	1.18%	0.65%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMOT and FLQM in my portfolio?

SMOT and FLQM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMOT or FLQM?

FLQM has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to SMOT (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOT dropped -23.36% vs FLQM's -37.26%.

Which ETF is better, SMOT or FLQM?

On 3-year performance, FLQM leads with 11.46% vs 11.06% for SMOT. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SMOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMOT or FLQM?

Over the 3-year period, FLQM has performed better with a 11.46% return vs 11.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMOT or FLQM?

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SMOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMOT or FLQM?

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 1.24% for SMOT.

What is the main difference between SMOT and FLQM?

SMOT tracks Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus, while FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SMOT and 0.30% for FLQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.