SMOM vs. XMVM
SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners, while XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. SMOM is actively managed, while XMVM is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMOM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
SMOM vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 8.00% return.
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMVM
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 29.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
SMOM vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 8.00% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOM and XMVM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOM vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
SMOM
XMVM
SMOM vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMOM | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.45 | 0.43 | +1.02 |
Drawdowns
SMOM vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOM | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -62.83% | +55.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.21% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -10.27% | +8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility
SMOM vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOM | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 15.37% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 21.54% | -8.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.62% | 22.80% | -10.18% |
SMOM vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOM vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than XMVM's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOM and XMVM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
SMOM is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XMVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.39% for XMVM.
Find the right allocation for SMOM and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer