PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOM vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOM vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


SMOM

1D
0.27%
1M
5.93%
YTD
9.82%
6M
10.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOM vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMOM and AFOS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOM vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMOM vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMOMAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

4.35

-2.90

Drawdowns

SMOM vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOM drawdown since its inception was -7.45%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOM and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOMAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-11.52%

+4.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.29%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-1.37%

-0.11%

Volatility

SMOM vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOMAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

20.19%

-7.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.62%

20.19%

-7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

20.19%

-7.57%

SMOM vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOM vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

SMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SMOM and AFOS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.

AFOS has the higher dividend yield at 0.22%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.

They also come from different issuers: Symmetry Partners and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for SMOM and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOM and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer