PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SMOG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.89%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.


SMOG

1D
-3.46%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
10.83%
6M
10.00%
1Y
33.70%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
12.89%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
10.83%33.36%-9.33%1.42%-29.92%-2.75%118.38%38.86%-10.18%22.69%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOG and QQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2007

0.68

The correlation between SMOG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMOG vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOG
QQQ

Utilities

34.4%
1.2%

Industrials

30.1%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

20.6%
11.4%

Technology

7.4%
58.7%

Energy

5.6%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%
1.0%

Financial Services

0.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

14.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

SMOG
34.4%
QQQ
1.2%

Industrials

SMOG
30.1%
QQQ
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SMOG
20.6%
QQQ
11.4%

Technology

SMOG
7.4%
QQQ
58.7%

Energy

SMOG
5.6%
QQQ
0.5%

Basic Materials

SMOG
1.3%
QQQ
1.0%

Financial Services

SMOG
0.6%
QQQ
0.2%

Communication Services

SMOG

-

QQQ
14.3%

Consumer Defensive

SMOG

-

QQQ
6.4%

Healthcare

SMOG

-

QQQ
3.7%

Real Estate

SMOG

-

QQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOG
SMOG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMOGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

2.93

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

10.86

-1.17

SMOG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-82.97%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.32%

-11.96%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-22.77%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-35.12%

-12.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-35.12%

-15.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.91%

-4.25%

-15.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.37%

-32.73%

-19.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.22%

+0.26%

Volatility

SMOG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 9.15% and 9.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.15%

9.17%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

14.57%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.70%

17.96%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.36%

22.69%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

22.42%

+3.32%

SMOG vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.42%1.57%1.64%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to SMOG (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 12.89% for SMOG. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 12.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.

SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer