PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SMOG vs. TAN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SMOGTAN
YTD Return-9.95%-34.92%
1Y Return3.68%-16.68%
3Y Return (Ann)-16.30%-29.70%
5Y Return (Ann)8.59%4.73%
10Y Return (Ann)6.70%1.06%
Sharpe Ratio0.22-0.39
Sortino Ratio0.47-0.31
Omega Ratio1.050.97
Calmar Ratio0.10-0.19
Martin Ratio0.51-0.77
Ulcer Index9.61%20.85%
Daily Std Dev22.37%41.67%
Max Drawdown-84.39%-95.29%
Current Drawdown-46.18%-84.13%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between SMOG and TAN is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

SMOG vs. TAN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a -9.95% return, which is significantly higher than TAN's -34.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SMOG has outperformed TAN with an annualized return of 6.70%, while TAN has yielded a comparatively lower 1.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.22%
-20.65%
SMOG
TAN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMOG vs. TAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than TAN's 0.69% expense ratio.


TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
Expense ratio chart for TAN: current value at 0.69% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.69%
Expense ratio chart for SMOG: current value at 0.63% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.63%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMOG vs. TAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMOG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMOG, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMOG, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMOG, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.05
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMOG, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.10
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMOG, currently valued at 0.51, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.51
TAN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.39
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.31
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TAN, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TAN, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.77

SMOG vs. TAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the TAN Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and TAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.22
-0.39
SMOG
TAN

Dividends

SMOG vs. TAN - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than TAN's 0.14% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SMOG
VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.76%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%0.21%0.99%
TAN
Invesco Solar ETF
0.14%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.30%0.70%1.77%5.04%1.60%1.88%1.28%

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. TAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, smaller than the maximum TAN drawdown of -95.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and TAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-46.18%
-84.13%
SMOG
TAN

Volatility

SMOG vs. TAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) is 8.34%, while Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) has a volatility of 15.92%. This indicates that SMOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.34%
15.92%
SMOG
TAN