SMOG vs. DRIV
SMOG (VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMOG is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMOG returned -0.48%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMOG charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.
Performance
SMOG vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 29.53% return.
SMOG
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 33.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
DRIV
- 1D
- -4.82%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 29.53%
- 6M
- 27.42%
- 1Y
- 72.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOG vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 10.83% | 33.36% | -9.33% | 1.42% | -29.92% | -2.75% | 118.38% | 38.86% | -10.49% |
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 29.53% | 30.42% | -5.04% | 26.14% | -34.13% | 27.80% | 62.76% | 28.54% | -21.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMOG and DRIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SMOG and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMOG vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMOG
DRIV
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
SMOG
DRIV
-
Industrials
SMOG
DRIV
Consumer Cyclical
SMOG
DRIV
Technology
SMOG
DRIV
Energy
SMOG
DRIV
-
Basic Materials
SMOG
DRIV
Financial Services
SMOG
DRIV
-
Communication Services
SMOG
-
DRIV
Consumer Defensive
SMOG
-
DRIV
-
Healthcare
SMOG
-
DRIV
-
Real Estate
SMOG
-
DRIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMOG vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank
SMOG
DRIV
SMOG vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMOG | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.42 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 5.40 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.70 | 17.18 | -7.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMOG vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than DRIV's maximum drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and DRIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMOG | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.39% | -41.93% | -42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -13.43% | +2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.72% | -34.18% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.86% | -41.93% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.91% | -9.90% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.37% | -15.07% | -37.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 4.21% | -0.73% |
Volatility
SMOG vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) is 9.15%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 13.60%. This indicates that SMOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMOG | DRIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.15% | 13.60% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.34% | 22.71% | -5.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.70% | 27.63% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 27.57% | -2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 27.63% | -1.89% |
SMOG vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMOG vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison
SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than DRIV's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF | 0.83% | 1.07% | 2.07% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.32% | 0.29% | 1.23% | 2.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMOG VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | 1.42% | 1.57% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.44% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMOG and DRIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRIV has higher volatility (13.60%) compared to SMOG (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs DRIV's -41.93%.
On 5-year performance, DRIV leads with 7.67% vs -0.48% for SMOG. On fees, SMOG is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, SMOG has been the lower-risk option at 9.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 7.67% return vs -0.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMOG is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.
SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.83% for DRIV.
SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DRIV is Global Equities. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.68% for DRIV.
DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMOG and DRIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer