PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOG vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOG vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, SMOG has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 12.70%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.98% annualized return.


SMOG

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.08%
YTD
18.16%
6M
17.43%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
12.70%

GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOG vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
18.16%33.36%-9.33%1.42%-29.92%-2.75%118.38%38.86%-10.18%22.69%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOG and GDX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.28

The correlation between SMOG and GDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (10 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMOG vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOG
GDX

Utilities

33.2%

-

Industrials

28.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

21.7%

-

Technology

8.4%

-

Energy

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

SMOG
33.2%
GDX

-

Industrials

SMOG
28.1%
GDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMOG
21.7%
GDX

-

Technology

SMOG
8.4%
GDX

-

Energy

SMOG
6.6%
GDX

-

Basic Materials

SMOG
1.2%
GDX
100.0%

Financial Services

SMOG
0.6%
GDX

-

Communication Services

SMOG

-

GDX

-

Consumer Defensive

SMOG

-

GDX

-

Healthcare

SMOG

-

GDX

-

Real Estate

SMOG

-

GDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOG vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOG
SMOG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOG vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMOGGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

1.35

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

1.76

+0.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

2.00

+2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.62

5.13

+8.49

SMOG vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMOGGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.35

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.52

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.38

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.13

-0.06

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOGGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-80.34%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-30.84%

+22.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-30.84%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-46.51%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-49.79%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-26.62%

+12.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.47%

-40.43%

-12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

11.99%

-8.89%

Volatility

SMOG vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) is 7.43%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that SMOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOGGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

15.40%

-7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

37.50%

-22.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

45.49%

-25.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

36.39%

-11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

37.18%

-11.45%

SMOG vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOG vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than GDX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.33%1.57%1.64%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOG and GDX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to SMOG (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs GDX's -80.34%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 12.70% for SMOG. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, SMOG has been the lower-risk option at 7.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.

SMOG has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while GDX is Gold. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.51% for GDX.

SMOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOG and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer