PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMOG vs. BIZD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMOG vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMOG achieves a 18.16% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -8.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SMOG has outperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 12.70%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.


SMOG

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.08%
YTD
18.16%
6M
17.43%
1Y
42.14%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*
12.70%

BIZD

1D
-2.28%
1M
-6.62%
YTD
-8.99%
6M
-10.20%
1Y
-12.94%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMOG vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
18.16%33.36%-9.33%1.42%-29.92%-2.75%118.38%38.86%-10.18%22.69%
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
-8.99%-4.96%15.63%27.02%-8.51%36.25%-7.12%30.87%-6.88%0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between SMOG and BIZD is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013

0.49

The correlation between SMOG and BIZD shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMOG vs. BIZD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMOG
BIZD

Utilities

33.2%

-

Industrials

28.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

21.7%

-

Technology

8.4%

-

Energy

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.6%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

SMOG
33.2%
BIZD

-

Industrials

SMOG
28.1%
BIZD

-

Consumer Cyclical

SMOG
21.7%
BIZD

-

Technology

SMOG
8.4%
BIZD

-

Energy

SMOG
6.6%
BIZD

-

Basic Materials

SMOG
1.2%
BIZD

-

Financial Services

SMOG
0.6%
BIZD
100.0%

Communication Services

SMOG

-

BIZD

-

Consumer Defensive

SMOG

-

BIZD

-

Healthcare

SMOG

-

BIZD

-

Real Estate

SMOG

-

BIZD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMOG vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMOG
SMOG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMOG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SMOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMOG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BIZD
BIZD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BIZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIZD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BIZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIZD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMOG vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMOGBIZDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

-0.72

+2.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

-0.93

+3.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.90

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

-0.58

+5.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.62

-1.03

+14.64

SMOG vs. BIZD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BIZD Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMOG and BIZD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMOGBIZDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

-0.72

+2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.23

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.36

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.30

-0.23

Drawdowns

SMOG vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMOG drawdown since its inception was -84.39%, which is greater than BIZD's maximum drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMOG and BIZD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMOGBIZDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.39%

-55.44%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-22.22%

+13.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-22.56%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.86%

-22.91%

-24.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.10%

-55.44%

+4.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.61%

-19.27%

+4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.47%

-6.72%

-45.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

12.63%

-9.53%

Volatility

SMOG vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) at 4.79%. This indicates that SMOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMOGBIZDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

4.79%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.46%

14.77%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.49%

18.11%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

17.40%

+7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.73%

21.74%

+3.99%

SMOG vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMOG has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than BIZD's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMOG vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison

SMOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than BIZD's 13.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIZD
VanEck BDC Income ETF
13.87%11.78%10.94%10.96%11.21%8.14%10.39%9.13%10.88%9.13%8.51%9.12%
SMOG
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
1.33%1.57%1.64%1.58%1.32%0.44%0.06%0.00%0.62%1.25%2.12%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMOG and BIZD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMOG has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to BIZD (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMOG dropped -84.39% vs BIZD's -55.44%.

On 10-year performance, SMOG leads with 12.70% vs 7.77% for BIZD. On fees, BIZD is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BIZD has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMOG has performed better with a 12.70% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIZD is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SMOG.

BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 13.87%, compared with 1.33% for SMOG.

SMOG is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while BIZD is Financials Equities. SMOG tracks MVIS Global Low Carbon Energy Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for SMOG and 0.42% for BIZD.

SMOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMOG and BIZD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer