SMNEY vs. CCJ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Siemens Energy AG (SMNEY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ).

Performance

SMNEY vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siemens Energy AG (SMNEY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SMNEY vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SMNEY Siemens Energy AG	25.32%	167.97%	298.17%	-29.76%	-27.66%	-31.90%	21.11%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	18.71%	78.38%	19.47%	90.49%	4.35%	63.19%	0.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SMNEY : $152.45B CCJ : $47.30B
EPS SMNEY : $2.16 CCJ : $1.35
PE Ratio SMNEY : 81.35 CCJ : 80.24
PEG Ratio SMNEY : 0.76 CCJ : 0.67
PS Ratio SMNEY : 3.93 CCJ : 13.59
PB Ratio SMNEY : 13.51 CCJ : 6.86
Total Revenue (TTM) SMNEY : $39.81B CCJ : $3.48B
Gross Profit (TTM) SMNEY : $7.27B CCJ : $1.02B
EBITDA (TTM) SMNEY : $4.73B CCJ : $1.05B

Returns By Period

SMNEY

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCJ

• 1D: 5.61%
• 1M: -8.27%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 29.77%
• 1Y: 164.39%
• 3Y*: 61.02%
• 5Y*: 44.84%
• 10Y*: 25.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SMNEY vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCJ

CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 95
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMNEY vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Energy AG (SMNEY) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMNEY	CCJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.24	—

Correlation

The correlation between SMNEY and CCJ is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SMNEY vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

SMNEY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMNEY Siemens Energy AG	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCJ Cameco Corporation	0.16%	0.19%	0.22%	0.20%	0.39%	0.29%	0.46%	0.67%	0.53%	4.33%	3.82%	3.24%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SMNEY	CCJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-87.53%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-25.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-19.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-46.29%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMNEY	CCJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	41.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	54.64%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	49.71%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	46.28%	—

Financials

SMNEY vs. CCJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Siemens Energy AG and Cameco Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SMNEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Siemens Energy AG reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 9.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.6%.

CCJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a gross profit of 266.88M and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.2%.

SMNEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Siemens Energy AG reported an operating income of 962.00M and revenue of 9.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

CCJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported an operating income of 163.55M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.6%.

SMNEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Siemens Energy AG reported a net income of 677.00M and revenue of 9.68B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.

CCJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cameco Corporation reported a net income of 198.90M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.