SMN vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - SMN tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMN returned -20.05% vs 3560.42% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.29, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

SMN vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -19.90% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 601.48% return.

SMN

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 6.34%
• 6M: -9.45%
• YTD: -19.90%
• 1Y: -20.05%
• 3Y*: -12.05%
• 5Y*: -16.15%
• 10Y*: -24.12%
• ALL TIME*: -27.55%

MUU

• 1D: 24.13%
• 1M: -34.82%
• 6M: 343.44%
• YTD: 601.48%
• 1Y: 3,560.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 564.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMN vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials	-19.90%	-17.96%	28.77%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	601.48%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SMN and MUU is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	-0.29

Return for Risk

SMN vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMN

SMN Risk / Return Rank: 5
SMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
SMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
SMN Omega Ratio Rank: 5
SMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SMN Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 98
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMN vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMN	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.57	23.50	-24.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.64	5.38	-6.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.68	-0.75
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	64.88	-65.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	199.64	-200.47

SMN vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMN and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMN vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMN	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-75.07%	-24.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.52%	-55.69%	+17.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.91%	-42.84%	-57.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.59%	-23.80%	-66.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.05%	18.08%	+5.97%

Volatility

SMN vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) is 9.80%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 63.78%. This indicates that SMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMN	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.80%	63.78%	-53.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.13%	126.19%	-98.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.26%	153.82%	-118.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.60%	142.92%	-103.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.84%	142.92%	-100.08%

SMN vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMN vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than MUU's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.97%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials	3.49%	4.08%	5.02%	4.54%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.72%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMN and MUU in my portfolio?

SMN and MUU have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMN or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (63.78%) compared to SMN (9.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, SMN or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3560.42% vs -20.05% for SMN. On fees, SMN is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SMN has been the lower-risk option at 9.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMN or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3560.42% return vs -20.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMN or MUU?

SMN is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMN or MUU?

SMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 0.97% for MUU.

What is the main difference between SMN and MUU?

SMN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.50 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.