SMN vs. JPME
SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while JPME is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMN returned -25.09%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for JPME. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPME.
Performance
SMN vs. JPME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -23.85% return, which is significantly lower than JPME's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SMN has underperformed JPME with an annualized return of -25.09%, while JPME has yielded a comparatively higher 11.01% annualized return.
SMN
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- -23.85%
- 6M
- -27.24%
- 1Y
- -28.88%
- 3Y*
- -17.26%
- 5Y*
- -14.35%
- 10Y*
- -25.09%
JPME
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- 22.44%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.01%
SMN vs. JPME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | -23.85% | -17.96% | 7.37% | -20.23% | -3.03% | -45.83% | -55.75% | -33.63% | 32.74% | -38.03% |
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 13.42% | 8.26% | 13.55% | 11.28% | -10.12% | 28.90% | 8.46% | 25.87% | -8.92% | 19.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMN and JPME is -0.79, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2016 | -0.81 |
The correlation between SMN and JPME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.84 to -0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMN vs. JPME — Risk / Return Rank
SMN
JPME
SMN vs. JPME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMN | JPME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | 1.87 | -2.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | 2.72 | -3.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 3.30 | -4.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 12.25 | -13.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMN | JPME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | 1.87 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.54 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.59 | 0.62 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.64 | -1.18 |
Drawdowns
SMN vs. JPME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than JPME's maximum drawdown of -41.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and JPME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMN | JPME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -41.01% | -58.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.52% | -6.84% | -31.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.71% | -18.70% | -35.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.05% | -19.30% | -46.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.39% | -41.01% | -54.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | 0.00% | -99.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.55% | -4.39% | -86.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.25% | 1.84% | +19.41% |
Volatility
SMN vs. JPME - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) at 3.43%. This indicates that SMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMN | JPME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.58% | 3.43% | +8.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.63% | 8.48% | +18.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.89% | 12.05% | +21.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.54% | 16.15% | +23.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.90% | 17.70% | +25.20% |
SMN vs. JPME - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JPME's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMN vs. JPME - Dividend Comparison
SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.62%, more than JPME's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.82% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% |
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials | 4.62% | 4.08% | 5.02% | 4.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.72% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMN and JPME have a correlation of -0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMN has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to JPME (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs JPME's -41.01%.
On 10-year performance, JPME leads with 11.01% vs -25.09% for SMN. On fees, JPME is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JPME has performed better with a 11.01% return vs -25.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPME is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.
SMN has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 1.82% for JPME.
SMN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JPME is Mid Cap Blend Equities. SMN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (-200%), while JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.24% for JPME.
JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMN and JPME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer