JPME vs. VO
JPME (JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - JPME tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JPME returned 11.12%/yr vs 11.67%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JPME charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
JPME vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPME achieves a 13.48% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.81% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JPME having a 11.12% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 11.67%.
JPME
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 13.48%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
VO
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 19.37%
- 3Y*
- 15.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
JPME vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 13.48% | 8.26% | 13.55% | 11.28% | -10.12% | 28.90% | 8.46% | 25.87% | -8.92% | 19.09% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.81% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPME and VO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2016 | 0.93 |
The correlation between JPME and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPME vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPME
VO
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
JPME
VO
Real Estate
JPME
VO
Industrials
JPME
VO
Healthcare
JPME
VO
Consumer Defensive
JPME
VO
Utilities
JPME
VO
Consumer Cyclical
JPME
VO
Financial Services
JPME
VO
Basic Materials
JPME
VO
Energy
JPME
VO
Communication Services
JPME
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPME vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
JPME
VO
JPME vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPME | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 2.40 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.44 | 9.06 | +3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPME vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPME drawdown since its inception was -41.01%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPME and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPME | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.01% | -58.87% | +17.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -8.17% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.70% | -19.02% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.30% | -27.57% | +8.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.01% | -39.37% | -1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -0.88% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.37% | -7.85% | +3.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 2.16% | -0.32% |
Volatility
JPME vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF (JPME) is 3.49%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that JPME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPME | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 4.44% | -0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 9.81% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 12.77% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 17.66% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 18.97% | -1.26% |
JPME vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPME has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JPME vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
JPME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than VO's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPME JPMorgan Diversified Return US Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.82% | 2.03% | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 1.68% | 1.80% | 1.17% | 0.91% | 0.00% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPME and VO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VO has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to JPME (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPME dropped -41.01% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.67% vs 11.12% for JPME. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JPME has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.67% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for JPME.
JPME has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.35% for VO.
JPME tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Mid Cap Equity Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JPME and 0.03% for VO.
JPME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPME and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer