SMN vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SMN (ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SMN is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. Over the past year, SMN returned -28.36% vs -60.55% for CRMG. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SMN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.

Performance

SMN vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMN achieves a -23.63% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.

SMN

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: -23.63%
• 6M: -28.01%
• 1Y: -28.36%
• 3Y*: -17.13%
• 5Y*: -14.30%
• 10Y*: -24.91%

CRMG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -56.09%
• 6M: -50.25%
• 1Y: -60.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMN vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials	-23.63%	-28.33%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-56.09%	3.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SMN and CRMG is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

SMN vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMN

SMN Risk / Return Rank: 3
SMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
SMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMN vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMN	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	-0.81	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.11	-1.14	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	0.86	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	-0.86	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	-1.47	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMN vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the CRMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMN and CRMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMN	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.84	-0.81	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.54	-0.65	+0.12

Drawdowns

SMN vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMN drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMN and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMN	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.92%	-74.38%	-25.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.52%	-70.91%	+32.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-95.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.91%	-67.87%	-32.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.55%	-37.81%	-52.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.36%	41.08%	-19.72%

Volatility

SMN vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials (SMN) is 11.03%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) has a volatility of 34.03%. This indicates that SMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMN	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.03%	34.03%	-23.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.56%	63.87%	-37.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.82%	75.31%	-41.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.54%	75.62%	-36.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.89%	75.62%	-32.73%

SMN vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMN vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

SMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMN ProShares UltraShort Basic Materials	4.61%	4.08%	5.02%	4.54%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.72%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMN and CRMG in my portfolio?

SMN and CRMG have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMN or CRMG?

CRMG has higher volatility (34.03%) compared to SMN (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMN dropped -99.92% vs CRMG's -74.38%.

Which ETF is better, SMN or CRMG?

On 1-year performance, SMN leads with -28.36% vs -60.55% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SMN has been the lower-risk option at 11.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMN or CRMG?

Over the 1-year period, SMN has performed better with a -28.36% return vs -60.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMN or CRMG?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMN or CRMG?

SMN has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between SMN and CRMG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SMN and 0.75% for CRMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.