SMMV vs. SMMD
SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) and SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index while SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMV returned 4.87%/yr vs 7.64%/yr for SMMD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMMV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SMMD.
Performance
SMMV vs. SMMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMV achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly lower than SMMD's 18.37% return.
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMD
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 36.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV vs. SMMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.04% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 7.23% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 18.37% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMV and SMMD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SMMV and SMMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMMV vs. SMMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMMV
SMMD
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
SMMV
SMMD
Industrials
SMMV
SMMD
Real Estate
SMMV
SMMD
Technology
SMMV
SMMD
Financial Services
SMMV
SMMD
Consumer Defensive
SMMV
SMMD
Utilities
SMMV
SMMD
Consumer Cyclical
SMMV
SMMD
Communication Services
SMMV
SMMD
Energy
SMMV
SMMD
Basic Materials
SMMV
SMMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMV vs. SMMD — Risk / Return Rank
SMMV
SMMD
SMMV vs. SMMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) and iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.36 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.75 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.82 | 14.29 | -11.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 2.11 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SMMV vs. SMMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMV drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum SMMD drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMV and SMMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -41.06% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -9.66% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.68% | -25.50% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.00% | -28.26% | +10.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -0.63% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -8.37% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.53% | -0.33% |
Volatility
SMMV vs. SMMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) is 2.27%, while iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that SMMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMV | SMMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 5.17% | -2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 12.58% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 17.20% | -7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 20.82% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 22.37% | -6.68% |
SMMV vs. SMMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMD's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMMV vs. SMMD - Dividend Comparison
SMMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than SMMD's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.75% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMV and SMMD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMV dropped -38.77% vs SMMD's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.64% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.
SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index, while SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SMMV and 0.15% for SMMD.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMV and SMMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer