SMMNY vs. PAVE

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

SMMNY (Siemens Healthineers AG ADR) is a stock, while PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Over the past 5 years, SMMNY returned -7.27%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMNY achieves a -22.91% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 18.83% return.

SMMNY

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -1.40%
• 6M: -25.22%
• YTD: -22.91%
• 1Y: -25.02%
• 3Y*: -8.65%
• 5Y*: -7.27%
• 10Y*: —

PAVE

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -1.68%
• 6M: 13.28%
• YTD: 18.83%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 22.24%
• 5Y*: 17.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SMMNY Siemens Healthineers AG ADR	-22.91%	1.38%	-7.92%	19.04%	-33.71%	50.75%	9.62%	15.89%	1.37%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	18.83%	19.36%	17.92%	31.01%	-7.17%	36.42%	19.72%	33.26%	-17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMNY and PAVE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2018	0.33

Return for Risk

SMMNY vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMNY

SMMNY Risk / Return Rank: 6
SMMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
SMMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SMMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SMMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
SMMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 51
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMMNY	PAVE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.11	1.34	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	1.97	-3.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.23	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	2.26	-3.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.63	7.93	-9.56

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMNY Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMNY and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMNY drawdown since its inception was -47.57%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMNY and PAVE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMMNY	PAVE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.57%	-44.08%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.10%	-11.91%	-19.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.77%	-26.23%	-8.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.57%	-26.23%	-21.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.22%	-5.34%	-37.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.50%	-6.20%	-12.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.15%	3.39%	+13.76%

Volatility

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siemens Healthineers AG ADR (SMMNY) is 5.09%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that SMMNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMMNY	PAVE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	7.89%	-2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.92%	16.29%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.16%	20.05%	+5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.56%	21.70%	+5.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.08%	24.39%	+3.69%

Dividends

SMMNY vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

SMMNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.76%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%
SMMNY Siemens Healthineers AG ADR	3.01%	1.85%	1.96%	1.73%	1.93%	1.28%	1.08%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMMNY and PAVE in my portfolio?

SMMNY and PAVE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMMNY or PAVE?

PAVE has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to SMMNY (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMNY dropped -47.57% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.