SMMD vs. TPLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX).
SMMD is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2500 Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2017. TPLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 30, 2003.
Performance
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 3.02% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 10.82% |
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund | -11.17% | 18.66% | 35.22% | 49.63% | -38.49% | 17.84% | 34.70% | 30.15% | 2.18% | 13.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 3.02% return, which is significantly higher than TPLGX's -11.17% return.
SMMD
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 13.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TPLGX
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- -11.17%
- 6M
- -10.20%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TPLGX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SMMD vs. TPLGX — Risk / Return Rank
SMMD
TPLGX
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMD | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.70 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.18 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.93 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 3.22 | +4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMD | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.70 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMD and TPLGX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Dividend Comparison
SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than TPLGX's 22.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.21% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPLGX T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund | 22.85% | 20.30% | 12.87% | 3.70% | 4.39% | 8.81% | 0.59% | 0.60% | 1.65% | 1.39% | 0.25% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, smaller than the maximum TPLGX drawdown of -54.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and TPLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMD | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -54.57% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.02% | -17.15% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -43.45% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -13.95% | +8.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -8.71% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 4.96% | -1.62% |
Volatility
SMMD vs. TPLGX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and T. Rowe Price Institutional Large Cap Core Growth Fund (TPLGX) have volatilities of 7.23% and 6.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SMMD | TPLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 6.97% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 12.37% | +0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 22.65% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 24.32% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 22.87% | -0.41% |