SMMD vs. SMMV
SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from iShares - SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index while SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMD returned 7.64%/yr vs 4.87%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
SMMD vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 18.37% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.04% return.
SMMD
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 6M
- 18.20%
- 1Y
- 36.03%
- 3Y*
- 18.53%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMD vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 18.37% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 10.82% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.04% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMD and SMMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SMMD and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SMMD vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMMD
SMMV
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
SMMD
SMMV
Technology
SMMD
SMMV
Financial Services
SMMD
SMMV
Healthcare
SMMD
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
SMMD
SMMV
Real Estate
SMMD
SMMV
Energy
SMMD
SMMV
Basic Materials
SMMD
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
SMMD
SMMV
Utilities
SMMD
SMMV
Communication Services
SMMD
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMD vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
SMMD
SMMV
SMMD vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMD | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 0.89 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.29 | 2.82 | +11.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMD | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.64 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SMMD vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMD | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -38.77% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -7.02% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.50% | -13.68% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -18.00% | -10.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -4.44% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -5.10% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.20% | +0.33% |
Volatility
SMMD vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.27%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMD | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 2.27% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 6.30% | +6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.20% | 9.73% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 13.50% | +7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 15.69% | +6.68% |
SMMD vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SMMD vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SMMV's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.75% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMMD and SMMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to SMMV (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.64% vs 4.87% for SMMV. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 4.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.
SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMMD and 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMD and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer