PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMMD vs. SMMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMMD vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 18.99% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 2.54% return.


SMMD

1D
0.52%
1M
3.44%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.98%
1Y
36.93%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*

SMMV

1D
0.49%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
2.54%
6M
3.30%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
4.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMMD vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
18.99%11.72%11.87%17.71%-18.53%18.30%19.98%28.01%-10.58%10.82%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
2.54%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%-2.88%24.21%1.15%7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SMMD and SMMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017

0.84

The correlation between SMMD and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMMD vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMMD
SMMV

Industrials

21.0%
13.8%

Technology

18.8%
10.9%

Financial Services

13.8%
10.9%

Healthcare

11.8%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
5.6%

Real Estate

6.7%
13.4%

Energy

4.9%
4.5%

Basic Materials

4.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
8.1%

Utilities

2.7%
7.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
5.4%

Industrials

SMMD
21.0%
SMMV
13.8%

Technology

SMMD
18.8%
SMMV
10.9%

Financial Services

SMMD
13.8%
SMMV
10.9%

Healthcare

SMMD
11.8%
SMMV
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SMMD
10.6%
SMMV
5.6%

Real Estate

SMMD
6.7%
SMMV
13.4%

Energy

SMMD
4.9%
SMMV
4.5%

Basic Materials

SMMD
4.4%
SMMV
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

SMMD
2.8%
SMMV
8.1%

Utilities

SMMD
2.7%
SMMV
7.7%

Communication Services

SMMD
2.5%
SMMV
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMMD vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMMD
SMMD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SMMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMMD vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMMDSMMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.03

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

3.27

+11.38

SMMD vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMMD and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMMDSMMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

0.75

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.37

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.52

-0.02

Drawdowns

SMMD vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and SMMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMMDSMMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-38.77%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-7.02%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.50%

-13.68%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-18.00%

-10.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-3.98%

+3.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.37%

-5.10%

-3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

2.22%

+0.31%

Volatility

SMMD vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.29%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMMDSMMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

2.29%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

6.30%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

9.72%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.82%

13.50%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

15.69%

+6.67%

SMMD vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMMD vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than SMMV's 1.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SMMD
iShares Russell 2500 ETF
1.05%1.28%1.27%1.44%1.79%1.12%1.31%1.50%2.45%0.68%0.00%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.74%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMMD and SMMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMMD has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to SMMV (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.75% vs 4.97% for SMMV. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.

SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMMD and 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMMD and SMMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer