SMMD vs. JPSE
SMMD (iShares Russell 2500 ETF) and JPSE (JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - SMMD tracks the Russell 2500 Index while JPSE tracks the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMMD returned 7.75%/yr vs 7.32%/yr for JPSE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMMD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for JPSE.
Performance
SMMD vs. JPSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMMD achieves a 18.99% return, which is significantly higher than JPSE's 16.81% return.
SMMD
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 18.99%
- 6M
- 17.98%
- 1Y
- 36.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
JPSE
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 15.74%
- 1Y
- 33.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- —
SMMD vs. JPSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 18.99% | 11.72% | 11.87% | 17.71% | -18.53% | 18.30% | 19.98% | 28.01% | -10.58% | 10.82% |
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 16.81% | 8.77% | 8.07% | 15.87% | -14.40% | 29.31% | 12.49% | 22.95% | -8.61% | 11.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMMD and JPSE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SMMD and JPSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMMD vs. JPSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMMD
JPSE
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
SMMD
JPSE
Technology
SMMD
JPSE
Financial Services
SMMD
JPSE
Healthcare
SMMD
JPSE
Consumer Cyclical
SMMD
JPSE
Real Estate
SMMD
JPSE
Energy
SMMD
JPSE
Basic Materials
SMMD
JPSE
Consumer Defensive
SMMD
JPSE
Utilities
SMMD
JPSE
Communication Services
SMMD
JPSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMMD vs. JPSE — Risk / Return Rank
SMMD
JPSE
SMMD vs. JPSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) and JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMMD | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 4.24 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.65 | 15.08 | -0.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMMD | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.12 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.37 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.49 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
SMMD vs. JPSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMMD drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, roughly equal to the maximum JPSE drawdown of -43.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMMD and JPSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMMD | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -43.02% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -8.00% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.50% | -25.49% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.26% | -25.56% | -2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.21% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.37% | -7.42% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.24% | +0.29% |
Volatility
SMMD vs. JPSE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Russell 2500 ETF (SMMD) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) at 4.40%. This indicates that SMMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMMD | JPSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.40% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 10.95% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 16.00% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 20.08% | +0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 21.81% | +0.55% |
SMMD vs. JPSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMMD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than JPSE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMMD vs. JPSE - Dividend Comparison
SMMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than JPSE's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.55% | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 0.74% | 0.14% |
SMMD iShares Russell 2500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.79% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 2.45% | 0.68% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SMMD and JPSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SMMD has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to JPSE (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMMD dropped -41.06% vs JPSE's -43.02%.
On 5-year performance, SMMD leads with 7.75% vs 7.32% for JPSE. On fees, SMMD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, JPSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SMMD has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JPSE.
JPSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.05% for SMMD.
SMMD tracks Russell 2500 Index, while JPSE tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMMD and 0.29% for JPSE.
SMMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMMD and JPSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer