JPSE vs. DFAS
JPSE (JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPSE is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index, while DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. JPSE is passively managed, while DFAS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JPSE returned 15.64%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for DFAS. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JPSE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for DFAS.
Performance
JPSE vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSE achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 12.81% return.
JPSE
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 17.30%
- 1Y
- 34.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JPSE vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 16.66% | 8.77% | 8.07% | 15.87% | -14.40% | 3.69% |
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSE and DFAS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.98 |
The correlation between JPSE and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JPSE vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSE
DFAS
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
JPSE
DFAS
Real Estate
JPSE
DFAS
Industrials
JPSE
DFAS
Financial Services
JPSE
DFAS
Basic Materials
JPSE
DFAS
Healthcare
JPSE
DFAS
Energy
JPSE
DFAS
Consumer Defensive
JPSE
DFAS
Consumer Cyclical
JPSE
DFAS
Utilities
JPSE
DFAS
Communication Services
JPSE
DFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSE vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank
JPSE
DFAS
JPSE vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JPSE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.66 | +0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.13 | 2.46 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.36 | 2.97 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.58 | 10.17 | +5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JPSE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.66 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.36 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
JPSE vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSE drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSE and DFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -26.13% | -16.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -9.36% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -26.13% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.81% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -8.31% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.73% | -0.49% |
Volatility
JPSE vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSE | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.31% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 11.58% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 16.77% | -0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.07% | 20.84% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 20.84% | +0.98% |
JPSE vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSE vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison
JPSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than DFAS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.55% | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 0.74% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, JPSE and DFAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JPSE has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSE dropped -43.02% vs DFAS's -26.13%.
On 3-year performance, JPSE leads with 15.64% vs 15.22% for DFAS. On fees, JPSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JPSE has performed better with a 15.64% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.
JPSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.
JPSE is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JPSE and 0.34% for DFAS.
JPSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPSE and DFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer