JPSE vs. FLQM
JPSE (JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JPSE is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index, while FLQM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JPSE returned 7.37%/yr vs 6.88%/yr for FLQM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JPSE charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLQM.
Performance
JPSE vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JPSE achieves a 18.18% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 1.78% return.
JPSE
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 18.18%
- 6M
- 16.01%
- 1Y
- 32.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 7.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FLQM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- —
JPSE vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 18.18% | 8.77% | 8.07% | 15.87% | -14.40% | 29.31% | 12.49% | 22.95% | -8.61% | 8.80% |
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.78% | 5.16% | 14.32% | 17.47% | -12.95% | 28.76% | 15.50% | 28.56% | -4.24% | 10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between JPSE and FLQM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JPSE and FLQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JPSE vs. FLQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JPSE
FLQM
Technology
Real Estate
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
JPSE
FLQM
Real Estate
JPSE
FLQM
Industrials
JPSE
FLQM
Financial Services
JPSE
FLQM
Basic Materials
JPSE
FLQM
Healthcare
JPSE
FLQM
Consumer Cyclical
JPSE
FLQM
Energy
JPSE
FLQM
Consumer Defensive
JPSE
FLQM
Utilities
JPSE
FLQM
Communication Services
JPSE
FLQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JPSE vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank
JPSE
FLQM
JPSE vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JPSE | FLQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 0.99 | +3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.71 | 2.72 | +11.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JPSE vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JPSE drawdown since its inception was -43.02%, which is greater than FLQM's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JPSE and FLQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JPSE | FLQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -37.26% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -7.57% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.49% | -19.70% | -5.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -22.51% | -3.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -2.30% | +1.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -4.90% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 2.74% | -0.50% |
Volatility
JPSE vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (JPSE) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) at 3.13%. This indicates that JPSE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JPSE | FLQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 3.13% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 8.54% | +2.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 12.23% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 16.40% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 18.45% | +3.34% |
JPSE vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JPSE has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JPSE vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison
JPSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FLQM's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.28% | 1.27% | 1.33% | 1.05% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.42% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
JPSE JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.62% | 1.66% | 1.76% | 1.55% | 1.24% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 1.18% | 0.74% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JPSE and FLQM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPSE has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to FLQM (3.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JPSE dropped -43.02% vs FLQM's -37.26%.
On 5-year performance, JPSE leads with 7.37% vs 6.88% for FLQM. On fees, JPSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 3.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPSE has performed better with a 7.37% return vs 6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JPSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FLQM.
FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.35% for JPSE.
JPSE is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while FLQM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. JPSE tracks JPMorgan Diversified Factor US Small Cap Equity Index, while FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JPSE and 0.30% for FLQM.
JPSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JPSE and FLQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer