PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 10.81%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
0.79%
1M
3.94%
YTD
17.79%
6M
16.16%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.81%

SPYM

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
8.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
17.79%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
8.21%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and SPYM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.69

The correlation between SMLV and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.69 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
SPYM

Financial Services

30.4%
11.9%

Industrials

14.2%
8.0%

Real Estate

12.3%
1.8%

Technology

11.7%
38.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.6%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.8%

Utilities

2.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.2%
10.1%

Energy

1.6%
3.1%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.4%
SPYM
11.9%

Industrials

SMLV
14.2%
SPYM
8.0%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.3%
SPYM
1.8%

Technology

SMLV
11.7%
SPYM
38.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.9%
SPYM
9.4%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
SPYM
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.0%
SPYM
4.6%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.4%
SPYM
1.8%

Utilities

SMLV
2.8%
SPYM
2.6%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
SPYM
10.1%

Energy

SMLV
1.6%
SPYM
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVSPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.68

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

11.98

-1.94

SMLV vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVSPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-54.46%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.90%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-18.72%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-24.48%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-33.87%

-8.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-3.14%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-7.14%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

1.99%

+0.66%

Volatility

SMLV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.51%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVSPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

4.83%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

9.83%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.70%

12.46%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.26%

16.90%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

18.03%

+2.91%

SMLV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than SPYM's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.31%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
1.30%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYM has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to SMLV (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.61% vs 10.81% for SMLV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 10.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.30% for SPYM.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SPYM is S&P 500. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer