PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLV achieves a 22.24% return, which is significantly higher than ILCV's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLV has underperformed ILCV with an annualized return of 10.42%, while ILCV has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.


SMLV

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.61%
6M
15.91%
YTD
22.24%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
10.42%
ALL TIME*
11.06%

ILCV

1D
-0.36%
1M
2.42%
6M
8.38%
YTD
10.57%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
11.48%
ALL TIME*
8.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
22.24%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%24.10%-6.62%5.68%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
10.57%18.79%17.03%14.43%-7.02%26.71%-0.84%25.19%-6.24%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and ILCV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2013

0.77

The correlation between SMLV and ILCV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMLV vs. ILCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
ILCV

Financial Services

30.9%
18.3%

Industrials

14.3%
6.8%

Real Estate

11.9%
1.9%

Technology

11.8%
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
9.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
7.3%

Basic Materials

3.3%
2.1%

Utilities

2.7%
3.4%

Communication Services

2.3%
9.9%

Energy

1.5%
5.5%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.9%
ILCV
18.3%

Industrials

SMLV
14.3%
ILCV
6.8%

Real Estate

SMLV
11.9%
ILCV
1.9%

Technology

SMLV
11.8%
ILCV
22.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
9.0%
ILCV
9.6%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.9%
ILCV
12.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
3.5%
ILCV
7.3%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.3%
ILCV
2.1%

Utilities

SMLV
2.7%
ILCV
3.4%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.3%
ILCV
9.9%

Energy

SMLV
1.5%
ILCV
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVILCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.84

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

15.71

-4.72

SMLV vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and ILCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and ILCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-58.63%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-6.55%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-14.95%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-18.58%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

-35.53%

-6.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-1.01%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-9.27%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.60%

+1.00%

Volatility

SMLV vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 2.36%. This indicates that SMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.36%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

7.34%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

10.00%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

14.15%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

16.63%

+4.28%

SMLV vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SMLV vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than ILCV's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.58%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.23%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and ILCV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to ILCV (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs ILCV's -58.63%.

On 10-year performance, ILCV leads with 11.48% vs 10.42% for SMLV. On fees, ILCV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCV has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ILCV has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SMLV.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.58% for ILCV.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while ILCV is Large Cap Value Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while ILCV tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.04% for ILCV.

ILCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and ILCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer