PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLV vs. FSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLV vs. FSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SMLV having a 18.33% return and FSMD slightly lower at 17.58%.


SMLV

1D
0.75%
1M
7.88%
YTD
18.33%
6M
15.42%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
10.74%

FSMD

1D
1.00%
1M
6.31%
YTD
17.58%
6M
15.58%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLV vs. FSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
18.33%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%10.14%
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
17.58%8.70%15.18%17.37%-11.15%26.40%8.94%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLV and FSMD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.90

The correlation between SMLV and FSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMLV vs. FSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMLV
FSMD

Financial Services

30.4%
14.8%

Industrials

14.2%
20.1%

Real Estate

12.3%
6.2%

Technology

11.7%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.7%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.4%
4.0%

Utilities

2.8%
2.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.9%

Energy

1.6%
4.1%

Financial Services

SMLV
30.4%
FSMD
14.8%

Industrials

SMLV
14.2%
FSMD
20.1%

Real Estate

SMLV
12.3%
FSMD
6.2%

Technology

SMLV
11.7%
FSMD
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SMLV
8.9%
FSMD
10.6%

Healthcare

SMLV
8.7%
FSMD
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

SMLV
4.0%
FSMD
3.1%

Basic Materials

SMLV
3.4%
FSMD
4.0%

Utilities

SMLV
2.8%
FSMD
2.1%

Communication Services

SMLV
2.2%
FSMD
2.9%

Energy

SMLV
1.6%
FSMD
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLV vs. FSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMD
FSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLV vs. FSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) and Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLVFSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

3.30

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

11.89

-1.81

SMLV vs. FSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLV and FSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLV vs. FSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLV drawdown since its inception was -42.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FSMD drawdown of -40.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLV and FSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLVFSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

-40.67%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.44%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-22.16%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-22.16%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-5.98%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.34%

+0.32%

Volatility

SMLV vs. FSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) is 3.80%, while Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF (FSMD) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that SMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLVFSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

5.14%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

11.85%

-2.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.74%

15.69%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.29%

18.55%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

21.43%

-0.48%

SMLV vs. FSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLV vs. FSMD - Dividend Comparison

SMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than FSMD's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMD
Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor ETF
1.18%1.33%1.29%1.37%1.54%1.18%1.32%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.24%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLV and FSMD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMD has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to SMLV (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLV dropped -42.45% vs FSMD's -40.67%.

On 5-year performance, FSMD leads with 10.00% vs 8.66% for SMLV. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FSMD has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FSMD.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.18% for FSMD.

SMLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FSMD is Small Cap Growth Equities. SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index, while FSMD tracks Fidelity Small-Mid Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SMLV and 0.29% for FSMD.

FSMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLV and FSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer