SMLL vs. VTWO
SMLL (Harbor Active Small Cap ETF) and VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMLL is actively managed, while VTWO is passively managed. Over the past year, SMLL returned -0.04% vs 41.90% for VTWO. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMLL charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VTWO.
Performance
SMLL vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLL achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 18.87% return.
SMLL
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 3.16%
- 6M
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- -0.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
SMLL vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 3.16% | -6.31% | 10.75% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 18.87% | 12.90% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLL and VTWO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between SMLL and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMLL vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMLL
VTWO
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Industrials
SMLL
VTWO
Financial Services
SMLL
VTWO
Technology
SMLL
VTWO
Consumer Cyclical
SMLL
VTWO
Energy
SMLL
VTWO
Basic Materials
SMLL
VTWO
Healthcare
SMLL
VTWO
Real Estate
SMLL
VTWO
Consumer Defensive
SMLL
VTWO
Utilities
SMLL
VTWO
Communication Services
SMLL
-
VTWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLL vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank
SMLL
VTWO
SMLL vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLL | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.36 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | 3.83 | -3.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 13.62 | -13.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLL | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 | 2.20 | -2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.53 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
SMLL vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLL drawdown since its inception was -23.56%, smaller than the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLL and VTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLL | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.56% | -41.19% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.53% | -10.99% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.33% | 0.00% | -10.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -8.39% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 3.08% | +4.53% |
Volatility
SMLL vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) is 4.31%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that SMLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLL | VTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 5.69% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 13.57% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 19.12% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 22.49% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 23.08% | -2.69% |
SMLL vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLL has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLL vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison
SMLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than VTWO's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 2.30% | 2.37% | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.07% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLL and VTWO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to SMLL (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLL dropped -23.56% vs VTWO's -41.19%.
On 1-year performance, VTWO leads with 41.90% vs -0.04% for SMLL. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SMLL has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 41.90% return vs -0.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SMLL.
SMLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.07% for VTWO.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SMLL and 0.06% for VTWO.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMLL and VTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer