PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLF vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLF vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SMLF has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 12.13%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.


SMLF

1D
-0.97%
1M
0.03%
6M
10.70%
YTD
16.36%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
12.13%

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLF vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMLF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
16.36%12.30%16.33%19.99%-12.19%26.53%8.38%21.56%-8.42%12.70%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
5.44%-4.99%13.50%3.63%9.46%5.73%-6.66%4.09%7.05%-9.10%

Correlation

The correlation between SMLF and UUP is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015

-0.15

The correlation between SMLF and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (5 years) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLF vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLF vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMLFUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.28

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

6.26

+4.26

SMLF vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMLF Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMLF and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMLF vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLFUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.89%

-22.19%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-3.65%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-10.05%

-16.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

-10.37%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

-14.24%

-27.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.74%

-1.26%

-1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-8.88%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.33%

+1.22%

Volatility

SMLF vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that SMLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLFUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

1.45%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

4.34%

+8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

6.03%

+11.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

7.22%

+13.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.76%

6.90%

+14.86%

SMLF vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLF vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLF
iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF
1.02%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLF and UUP have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLF has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMLF dropped -41.89% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 10-year performance, SMLF leads with 12.13% vs 3.17% for UUP. On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMLF has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.

UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.02% for SMLF.

SMLF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while UUP is Currency. SMLF tracks STOXX U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor Index, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMLF and 0.75% for UUP.

SMLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLF and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer