SMLF vs. RB
SMLF (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMLF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMLF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.
Performance
SMLF vs. RB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.95% return.
SMLF
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 14.46%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
RB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLF vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 14.46% | 11.66% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.95% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLF and RB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLF vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank
SMLF
RB
SMLF vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMLF | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMLF | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 3.19 | -2.66 |
Drawdowns
SMLF vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and RB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLF | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.89% | -1.70% | -40.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.30% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -0.41% | -6.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
SMLF vs. RB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLF | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 6.21% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 6.21% | +14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 6.21% | +15.57% |
SMLF vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLF vs. RB - Dividend Comparison
SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than RB's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 1.99% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLF iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 1.03% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLF and RB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMLF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.03% for SMLF.
SMLF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. SMLF tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SMLF and 0.58% for RB.
Find the right allocation for SMLF and RB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer