PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMLF vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMLF vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMLF achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.95% return.


SMLF

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.07%
YTD
14.46%
6M
14.20%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
19.85%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
12.36%

RB

1D
0.09%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.95%
6M
9.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMLF vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SMLF and RB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMLF vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMLF
SMLF Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SMLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

RB
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMLF vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (SMLF) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMLFRBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.27

SMLF vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMLFRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

3.19

-2.66

Drawdowns

SMLF vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMLFRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.89%

-1.70%

-40.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.30%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.60%

-0.41%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

Volatility

SMLF vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMLFRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.21%

6.21%

+11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

6.21%

+14.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

6.21%

+15.57%

SMLF vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMLF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMLF vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than RB's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RB
ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF
1.99%1.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
1.03%1.14%1.33%1.13%1.23%1.07%1.33%1.39%1.17%0.93%0.78%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMLF and RB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMLF is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.03% for SMLF.

SMLF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. SMLF tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Diversified Multi-Factor, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SMLF and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMLF and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer