RB vs. SCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) and SCOW (Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000, while SCOW is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RB charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SCOW.

Performance

RB vs. SCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RB having a 6.76% return and SCOW slightly lower at 6.60%.

RB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.76%
• 6M: 8.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCOW

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 5.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RB vs. SCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.76%	8.44%
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	6.60%	-2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between RB and SCOW is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

RB vs. SCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB) and Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RB	SCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.15	0.35	+2.80

Drawdowns

RB vs. SCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RB drawdown since its inception was -1.70%, smaller than the maximum SCOW drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RB and SCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RB	SCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-10.09%	+8.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-1.46%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.41%	-3.20%	+2.79%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RB	SCOW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.21%	16.94%	-10.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.21%	16.94%	-10.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.21%	16.94%	-10.73%

RB vs. SCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RB has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SCOW's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

RB vs. SCOW - Dividend Comparison

RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than SCOW's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	2.00%	1.78%
SCOW Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF	0.27%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RB and SCOW in my portfolio?

RB and SCOW have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RB or SCOW?

On fees, RB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RB or SCOW?

RB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RB or SCOW?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.27% for SCOW.

What is the main difference between RB and SCOW?

RB is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCOW is Small Cap Blend Equities. RB tracks Russell 2000, while SCOW tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for RB and 0.59% for SCOW.