SMLF vs. CVSM
SMLF (iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. SMLF is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMLF charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
SMLF vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMLF
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- YTD
- 16.36%
- 1Y
- 26.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.13%
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMLF vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | 6.06% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMLF and CVSM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMLF vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
SMLF
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMLF vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (SMLF) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMLF | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMLF vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMLF drawdown since its inception was -41.89%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMLF and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMLF | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.89% | -3.36% | -38.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -1.46% | -1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.55% | -1.01% | -5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | — | — |
Volatility
SMLF vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMLF | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.65% | 11.19% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 11.19% | +9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 11.19% | +10.57% |
SMLF vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMLF has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMLF vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
SMLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMLF iShares U.S. Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.07% | 1.33% | 1.39% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMLF and CVSM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMLF is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMLF is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
SMLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SMLF and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for SMLF and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer