SMIN vs. BKEM
SMIN (iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - SMIN tracks the MSCI India Small Cap Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SMIN returned 6.49%/yr vs 7.09%/yr for BKEM. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMIN charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.
Performance
SMIN vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMIN achieves a -3.98% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 28.54% return.
SMIN
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- -3.98%
- 6M
- -3.28%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
BKEM
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 28.54%
- 6M
- 30.76%
- 1Y
- 52.98%
- 3Y*
- 23.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- —
SMIN vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | -3.98% | -6.68% | 16.78% | 35.41% | -14.23% | 44.43% | 73.87% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 28.54% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 47.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMIN and BKEM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SMIN and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMIN vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMIN
BKEM
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
SMIN
BKEM
Financial Services
SMIN
BKEM
Healthcare
SMIN
BKEM
Consumer Cyclical
SMIN
BKEM
Basic Materials
SMIN
BKEM
Technology
SMIN
BKEM
Consumer Defensive
SMIN
BKEM
Real Estate
SMIN
BKEM
Utilities
SMIN
BKEM
Communication Services
SMIN
BKEM
Energy
SMIN
BKEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMIN vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
SMIN
BKEM
SMIN vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMIN | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.48 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 4.06 | -4.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 15.58 | -16.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMIN | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 2.73 | -3.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.38 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.74 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
SMIN vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMIN drawdown since its inception was -60.50%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIN and BKEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMIN | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -39.48% | -21.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.54% | -13.11% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -18.38% | -9.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -36.53% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.02% | -2.25% | -13.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -15.99% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.82% | 3.41% | +7.41% |
Volatility
SMIN vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF (SMIN) is 6.11%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that SMIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMIN | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 8.13% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.65% | 16.82% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 19.52% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.86% | 18.73% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 19.12% | +3.71% |
SMIN vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMIN has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMIN vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
SMIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than BKEM's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.47% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMIN iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF | 2.10% | 2.01% | 6.84% | 0.41% | 0.01% | 1.27% | 1.06% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 2.30% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMIN and BKEM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKEM has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to SMIN (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIN dropped -60.50% vs BKEM's -39.48%.
On 5-year performance, BKEM leads with 7.09% vs 6.49% for SMIN. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SMIN has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKEM has performed better with a 7.09% return vs 6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for SMIN.
SMIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.47% for BKEM.
SMIN tracks MSCI India Small Cap Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for SMIN and 0.11% for BKEM.
BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMIN and BKEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer