PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMIFX vs. JDBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMIFX achieves a 17.18% return, which is significantly higher than JDBAX's 3.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SMIFX has underperformed JDBAX with an annualized return of 9.55%, while JDBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.


SMIFX

1D
0.80%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.18%
6M
17.20%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
9.55%

JDBAX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.13%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.83%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMIFX
Sound Mind Investing Fund
17.18%3.16%16.65%5.17%-8.93%11.15%20.76%19.28%-8.56%17.49%
JDBAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A
3.84%14.78%20.54%15.17%-16.75%16.99%14.14%25.01%0.39%18.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SMIFX and JDBAX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2005

0.86

The correlation between SMIFX and JDBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMIFX vs. JDBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMIFX
SMIFX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SMIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SMIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JDBAX
JDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) and Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMIFXJDBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

1.89

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

8.15

+0.92

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the JDBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMIFX and JDBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMIFXJDBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.77

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.78

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.98

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.67

-0.35

Drawdowns

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMIFX drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, which is greater than JDBAX's maximum drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMIFX and JDBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMIFXJDBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-34.14%

-20.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-8.16%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.98%

-11.96%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.36%

-21.63%

-19.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.36%

-22.48%

-18.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

0.00%

-8.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.28%

-5.38%

-8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.89%

+0.42%

Volatility

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Volatility Comparison

Sound Mind Investing Fund (SMIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) at 2.46%. This indicates that SMIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JDBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMIFXJDBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.46%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

6.94%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

8.71%

+2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.03%

11.34%

+17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.18%

11.27%

+12.91%

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMIFX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than JDBAX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMIFX vs. JDBAX - Dividend Comparison

SMIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than JDBAX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JDBAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A
8.34%8.62%11.67%2.08%1.76%4.34%2.35%4.62%6.84%5.05%2.43%5.68%
SMIFX
Sound Mind Investing Fund
4.55%5.33%1.28%1.73%0.97%46.86%0.00%0.48%26.02%10.06%0.00%14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMIFX and JDBAX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMIFX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to JDBAX (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMIFX dropped -54.33% vs JDBAX's -34.14%.

SMIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMIFX and JDBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer