JDBAX vs. JNGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX).
JDBAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 1, 1992. JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDBAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A | -5.36% | 14.78% | 20.54% | 15.17% | -16.75% | 16.99% | 14.14% | 25.01% | 0.39% | 18.23% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -7.02% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDBAX achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than JNGTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JDBAX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.41% annualized return.
JDBAX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -4.16%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
JNGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 20.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDBAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JDBAX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JDBAX
JNGTX
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDBAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 1.73 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.80 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 6.10 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDBAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.41 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.84 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.44 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between JDBAX and JNGTX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison
JDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than JNGTX's 14.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDBAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A | 8.67% | 8.62% | 11.67% | 2.08% | 1.76% | 4.34% | 2.35% | 4.62% | 6.84% | 5.05% | 2.43% | 5.68% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.43% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
Drawdowns
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDBAX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDBAX and JNGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDBAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.14% | -84.79% | +50.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -15.93% | +7.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -46.46% | +24.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.48% | -46.46% | +23.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -12.54% | +5.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -40.47% | +35.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 4.69% | -2.64% |
Volatility
JDBAX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) is 3.84%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that JDBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JDBAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 8.32% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 16.27% | -9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 25.51% | -13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 26.29% | -14.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 24.40% | -13.18% |