JDBAX vs. PRWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX).
JDBAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 1, 1992. PRWCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDBAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A | -5.36% | 14.78% | 20.54% | 15.17% | -16.75% | 16.99% | 14.14% | 25.01% | 0.39% | 18.23% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | -3.22% | 20.92% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDBAX achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly lower than PRWCX's -3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JDBAX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.41% annualized return.
JDBAX
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -4.85%
- YTD
- -5.36%
- 6M
- -4.16%
- 1Y
- 10.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 5.51%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 9.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDBAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JDBAX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
JDBAX
PRWCX
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDBAX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.39 | 2.37 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 2.34 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 9.70 | -4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDBAX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.27 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.70 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.88 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.90 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between JDBAX and PRWCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
JDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than PRWCX's 16.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDBAX Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A | 8.67% | 8.62% | 11.67% | 2.08% | 1.76% | 4.34% | 2.35% | 4.62% | 6.84% | 5.05% | 2.43% | 5.68% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 16.24% | 15.72% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Drawdowns
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDBAX drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDBAX and PRWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDBAX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.14% | -41.77% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -6.80% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.63% | -17.07% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.48% | -26.86% | +4.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -4.47% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -3.34% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | 1.64% | +0.41% |
Volatility
JDBAX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class A (JDBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 3.64%. This indicates that JDBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JDBAX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.84% | 3.64% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.68% | 9.78% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 13.57% | -1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 13.24% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 12.98% | -1.76% |