PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMICX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMICX achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 9.37% return.


SMICX

1D
0.52%
1M
2.66%
YTD
5.18%
6M
5.15%
1Y
14.21%
3Y*
12.41%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
5.18%12.07%11.02%12.83%-1.71%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SMICX and FRGAX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.93

The correlation between SMICX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMICX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMICX
SMICX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMICXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.27

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.41

14.61

-5.20

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMICX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMICX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMICXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.55

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.54

-0.91

Drawdowns

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMICX drawdown since its inception was -22.85%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMICX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMICXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.85%

-11.77%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.64%

-7.03%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

-11.77%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.39%

-1.58%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

1.57%

-0.01%

Volatility

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.65% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMICXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

2.75%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.68%

7.19%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.51%

9.03%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.85%

10.31%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

10.31%

+0.80%

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMICX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMICX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
10.59%11.14%4.00%0.87%7.81%11.59%1.39%3.45%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SMICX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to SMICX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMICX dropped -22.85% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMICX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer