SMHX vs. XSD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) are both Semiconductors funds - SMHX tracks the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index while XSD tracks the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMHX returned 113.51% vs 147.65% for XSD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

SMHX vs. XSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 64.32% return, which is significantly lower than XSD's 87.88% return.

SMHX

• 1D: -5.60%
• 1M: 3.65%
• YTD: 64.32%
• 6M: 61.18%
• 1Y: 113.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XSD

• 1D: -6.88%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 87.88%
• 6M: 83.00%
• 1Y: 147.65%
• 3Y*: 43.10%
• 5Y*: 26.73%
• 10Y*: 30.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMHX vs. XSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	64.32%	30.00%	15.56%
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF	87.88%	29.85%	5.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and XSD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2024	0.91

The correlation between SMHX and XSD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMHX vs. XSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMHX	XSD
Technology	100.0%	98.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	2.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SMHX vs. XSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHX

SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

XSD

XSD Risk / Return Rank: 92
XSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
XSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
XSD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
XSD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMHX vs. XSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMHX	XSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	3.65	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	3.77	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.51	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.69	7.98	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.96	26.27	-8.31

SMHX vs. XSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHX Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is comparable to the XSD Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHX and XSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMHX vs. XSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum XSD drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and XSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMHX	XSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.53%	-64.56%	+26.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.06%	-18.61%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-41.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.91%	-7.06%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.34%	-13.72%	+6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.34%	5.64%	+0.70%

Volatility

SMHX vs. XSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) is 19.93%, while SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a volatility of 22.76%. This indicates that SMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMHX	XSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.93%	22.76%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.76%	33.53%	-3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.70%	40.74%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.48%	39.20%	+2.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.48%	35.44%	+6.04%

SMHX vs. XSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SMHX and XSD have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

SMHX vs. XSD - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than XSD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF	0.13%	0.26%	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.10%	0.26%	0.51%	1.16%	0.59%	0.64%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMHX and XSD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, SMHX and XSD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SMHX or XSD?

XSD has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to SMHX (19.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs XSD's -64.56%.

Which ETF is better, SMHX or XSD?

On 1-year performance, XSD leads with 147.65% vs 113.51% for SMHX. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, SMHX has been the lower-risk option at 19.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMHX or XSD?

Over the 1-year period, XSD has performed better with a 147.65% return vs 113.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMHX or XSD?

SMHX and XSD have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMHX or XSD?

XSD has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.01% for SMHX.

What is the main difference between SMHX and XSD?

SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.