SMHX vs. IGPT
SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and IGPT (Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMHX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while IGPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SMHX returned 139.42% vs 123.95% for IGPT. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMHX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for IGPT.
Performance
SMHX vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 78.44% return, which is significantly higher than IGPT's 72.49% return.
SMHX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 33.64%
- YTD
- 78.44%
- 6M
- 72.62%
- 1Y
- 139.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGPT
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 28.39%
- YTD
- 72.49%
- 6M
- 75.56%
- 1Y
- 123.95%
- 3Y*
- 43.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.89%
- 10Y*
- 22.30%
SMHX vs. IGPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 78.44% | 30.00% | 17.76% |
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 72.49% | 31.55% | 3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHX and IGPT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SMHX and IGPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
SMHX vs. IGPT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMHX
IGPT
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SMHX
IGPT
Basic Materials
SMHX
-
IGPT
-
Communication Services
SMHX
-
IGPT
Consumer Cyclical
SMHX
-
IGPT
-
Consumer Defensive
SMHX
-
IGPT
-
Energy
SMHX
-
IGPT
-
Financial Services
SMHX
-
IGPT
Healthcare
SMHX
-
IGPT
Industrials
SMHX
-
IGPT
Real Estate
SMHX
-
IGPT
Utilities
SMHX
-
IGPT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHX vs. IGPT — Risk / Return Rank
SMHX
IGPT
SMHX vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHX | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.67 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.22 | 7.47 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.13 | 29.16 | -6.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHX | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30 | 4.39 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | 0.63 | +1.31 |
Drawdowns
SMHX vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, smaller than the maximum IGPT drawdown of -50.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and IGPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHX | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.53% | -50.14% | +11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.06% | -16.68% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -11.96% | +4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 4.27% | +1.78% |
Volatility
SMHX vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) is 11.81%, while Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that SMHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHX | IGPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.81% | 12.51% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.06% | 23.50% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.69% | 28.42% | +4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 27.66% | +12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.97% | 26.33% | +13.64% |
SMHX vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IGPT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHX vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison
SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IGPT's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGPT Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 6.21% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.15% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHX and IGPT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGPT has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to SMHX (11.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs IGPT's -50.14%.
On 1-year performance, SMHX leads with 139.42% vs 123.95% for IGPT. On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMHX has been the lower-risk option at 11.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMHX has performed better with a 139.42% return vs 123.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IGPT.
IGPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.01% for SMHX.
SMHX is categorized as Semiconductors, while IGPT is Technology Equities. SMHX tracks MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while IGPT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Software Development Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.60% for IGPT.
IGPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 4.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMHX and IGPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer