SMHX vs. CLOB

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) and CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMHX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index, while CLOB is a CLO fund actively managed by VanEck. SMHX is passively managed, while CLOB is actively managed. Over the past year, SMHX returned 70.23% vs 5.90% for CLOB. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SMHX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CLOB.

Performance

SMHX vs. CLOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHX achieves a 54.30% return, which is significantly higher than CLOB's 2.83% return.

SMHX

• 1D: 5.79%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 54.30%
• YTD: 54.30%
• 1Y: 70.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 54.49%

CLOB

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.68%
• 6M: 2.19%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	$1.43M	$865.97K	$596.87K
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	$4.97M	$5.79M	$8.43M

SMHX vs. CLOB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	54.30%	30.00%	15.20%
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	2.83%	6.94%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SMHX and CLOB is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.27

Return for Risk

SMHX vs. CLOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SMHX

SMHX Risk / Return Rank: 65
SMHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SMHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
SMHX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SMHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SMHX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CLOB

CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 83
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SMHX vs. CLOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) and VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMHX	CLOB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.08	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.01	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.46	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	3.03	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.68	13.07	-4.39

SMHX vs. CLOB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the CLOB Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHX and CLOB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMHX vs. CLOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHX drawdown since its inception was -38.53%, which is greater than CLOB's maximum drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHX and CLOB.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMHX	CLOB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.53%	-5.54%	-32.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.93%	-1.96%	-22.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.53%	0.00%	-13.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.76%	-0.28%	-7.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.11%	0.45%	+7.66%

Volatility

SMHX vs. CLOB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) at 0.39%. This indicates that SMHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMHX	CLOB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.07%	0.39%	+14.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.70%	2.40%	+31.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.93%	2.84%	+37.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.11%	5.29%	+36.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.11%	5.29%	+36.82%

SMHX vs. CLOB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOB's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMHX vs. CLOB - Dividend Comparison

SMHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than CLOB's 6.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	6.21%	6.61%	1.65%
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMHX and CLOB in my portfolio?

SMHX and CLOB have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMHX or CLOB?

SMHX has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to CLOB (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMHX dropped -38.53% vs CLOB's -5.54%.

Which ETF is better, SMHX or CLOB?

On 1-year performance, SMHX leads with 70.23% vs 5.90% for CLOB. On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CLOB has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMHX or CLOB?

Over the 1-year period, SMHX has performed better with a 70.23% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMHX or CLOB?

SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CLOB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMHX or CLOB?

CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 0.02% for SMHX.

What is the main difference between SMHX and CLOB?

SMHX is categorized as Semiconductors, while CLOB is CLO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMHX and 0.45% for CLOB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.