PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOB vs. JAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLOB vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOB achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than JAAA's 2.09% return.


CLOB

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.95%
6M
1.84%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.09%
6M
2.37%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
6.59%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOB vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
1.95%6.94%2.77%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
2.09%5.16%1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOB and JAAA is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLOB vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOB
CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

JAAA
JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOB vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLOBJAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

2.79

-1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

13.24

-10.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.91

71.33

-57.42

CLOB vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOB Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 6.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOB and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLOB vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOB drawdown since its inception was -5.54%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOB and JAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOBJAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-2.64%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-0.39%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.30%

-0.25%

-0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.07%

+0.38%

Volatility

CLOB vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.12%. This indicates that CLOB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLOBJAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

0.12%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.44%

0.64%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

0.83%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

1.67%

+3.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.46%

1.64%

+3.82%

CLOB vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOB has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLOB vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than JAAA's 4.99% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CLOB
VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF
6.42%6.61%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JAAA
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
4.99%5.30%6.35%6.11%2.74%1.21%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLOB and JAAA have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLOB has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to JAAA (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOB dropped -5.54% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

On 1-year performance, CLOB leads with 6.30% vs 5.12% for JAAA. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CLOB has performed better with a 6.30% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CLOB.

CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 4.99% for JAAA.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CLOB and 0.20% for JAAA.

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.19 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLOB and JAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer