SMHB vs. AMNA
SMHB (ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B) and AMNA (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - SMHB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%), while AMNA is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMHB charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMNA.
Performance
SMHB vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SMHB
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 5.72%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- -6.36%
- 10Y*
- —
AMNA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHB vs. AMNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 5.72% | -7.75% | -15.85% | 35.96% | -36.03% | 68.86% | 62.56% |
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 44.30% | 12.50% | 20.41% | 36.44% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMHB and AMNA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SMHB and AMNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMHB vs. AMNA — Risk / Return Rank
SMHB
AMNA
SMHB vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SMHB | AMNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SMHB | AMNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SMHB vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMHB | AMNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.81% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.21% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.38% | — | — |
Volatility
SMHB vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMHB | AMNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.92% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.93% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.33% | — | — |
SMHB vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMHB vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison
SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.00%, while AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.32% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 21.00% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMHB and AMNA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMNA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMNA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SMHB.
SMHB has the higher dividend yield at 21.00%, compared with 0.00% for AMNA.
SMHB is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMNA is MLPs. SMHB tracks Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%), while AMNA tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SMHB and 0.75% for AMNA.
Find the right allocation for SMHB and AMNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer