PortfoliosLab logo
SMHB vs. QYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMHB and QYLD is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

SMHB vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SMHB:

-0.34

QYLD:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

SMHB:

-0.23

QYLD:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

SMHB:

0.97

QYLD:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

SMHB:

-0.30

QYLD:

-0.10

Martin Ratio

SMHB:

-1.13

QYLD:

-0.73

Ulcer Index

SMHB:

15.36%

QYLD:

5.56%

Daily Std Dev

SMHB:

47.53%

QYLD:

19.32%

Max Drawdown

SMHB:

-90.13%

QYLD:

-40.69%

Current Drawdown

SMHB:

-43.34%

QYLD:

-34.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMHB achieves a -7.31% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -8.76% return.


SMHB

YTD

-7.31%

1M

18.64%

6M

-13.16%

1Y

-16.03%

3Y*

-5.99%

5Y*

20.00%

10Y*

N/A

QYLD

YTD

-8.76%

1M

1.87%

6M

-5.90%

1Y

-3.97%

3Y*

-1.53%

5Y*

-3.81%

10Y*

-3.25%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMHB vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMHB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMHB vs. QYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMHB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMHB is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMHB is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMHB is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMHB is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMHB is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMHB is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QYLD is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QYLD is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QYLD is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QYLD is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QYLD is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QYLD is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SMHB vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current SMHB Sharpe Ratio is -0.34, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMHB and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

SMHB vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.49%, more than QYLD's 13.82% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
24.49%22.68%15.27%24.18%12.22%16.86%22.16%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
13.82%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%10.74%

Drawdowns

SMHB vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMHB drawdown since its inception was -90.13%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMHB and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

SMHB vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 3.35%. This indicates that SMHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...