SMH vs. UC15.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 36.02%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for UC15.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.

Performance

SMH vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SMH is traded in USD, while UC15.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC15.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 58.19% return, which is significantly higher than UC15.L's 21.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed UC15.L with an annualized return of 36.02%, while UC15.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.

SMH

• 1D: -9.22%
• 1M: 3.63%
• YTD: 58.19%
• 6M: 56.81%
• 1Y: 127.40%
• 3Y*: 58.39%
• 5Y*: 36.10%
• 10Y*: 36.02%

UC15.L

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 21.20%
• 6M: 21.79%
• 1Y: 29.95%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: 11.58%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	58.19%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.20%	10.31%	4.66%	-1.58%	16.07%	34.87%	0.50%	9.54%	-10.61%	6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and UC15.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013	0.17

The correlation between SMH and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SMH	UC15.L
Technology	100.0%	31.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Communication Services	-	15.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.7%
Energy	-	14.2%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	9.8%
Industrials	-	6.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

SMH vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 95

UC15.L

UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SMH	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.00	2.17	+1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	2.86	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.40	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.58	6.36	+2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	32.42	14.17	+18.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SMH vs. UC15.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.00, which is higher than the UC15.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and UC15.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SMH	UC15.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.00	2.17	+1.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.77	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.11	0.61	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.26	+0.07

Drawdowns

SMH vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than UC15.L's maximum drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and UC15.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	UC15.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-51.79%	-33.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-4.88%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	-11.19%	-24.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	-18.05%	-27.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	-35.40%	-9.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.69%	-3.98%	-6.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.08%	-20.55%	-20.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	2.20%	+1.74%

Volatility

SMH vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) at 4.83%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	UC15.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.88%	4.83%	+10.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.35%	11.92%	+14.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.03%	14.32%	+17.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.24%	15.02%	+20.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.70%	14.62%	+18.08%

SMH vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.19%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and UC15.L in my portfolio?

SMH and UC15.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMH or UC15.L?

On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or UC15.L?

UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

What is the main difference between SMH and UC15.L?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while UC15.L is Commodities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.34% for UC15.L.