PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SMH vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SMH vs. SPEM

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while SPEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the S&P Emerging Markets BMI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for SPEM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SPEM.

Performance

SMH vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 37.49%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.

SMH

1D
1.72%
1M
11.44%
YTD
72.15%
6M
75.62%
1Y
141.99%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
38.42%
10Y*
37.49%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
2.50%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
27.73%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		72.15%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF		11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and SPEM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007

0.64

The correlation between SMH and SPEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SMH
SPEM

Technology

100.0%
32.1%

Basic Materials

-

8.0%

Communication Services

-

6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.6%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

19.2%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Technology

SMH
100.0%
SPEM
32.1%

Basic Materials

SMH

-

SPEM
8.0%

Communication Services

SMH

-

SPEM
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

SPEM
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

SPEM
3.6%

Energy

SMH

-

SPEM
4.2%

Financial Services

SMH

-

SPEM
19.2%

Healthcare

SMH

-

SPEM
3.7%

Industrials

SMH

-

SPEM
8.3%

Real Estate

SMH

-

SPEM
1.8%

Utilities

SMH

-

SPEM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK
Often compared with SPEM:
SPEM vs. VWOSPEM vs. EEMSPEM vs. EMXCSPEM vs. ESGESPEM vs. EMGFSPEM vs. EMCRSPEM vs. BKEM

Return for Risk

SMH vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SMHSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.13
1.55

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.26
2.16

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.29

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.18

2.28

+6.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.74

8.16

+25.58

SMH vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than SPEM's maximum drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and SPEM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SMHSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-64.41%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-11.36%

-3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-17.62%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-31.75%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-36.06%

-9.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-2.40%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-14.73%

-26.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

3.17%

+0.89%

Volatility

SMH vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 6.87%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SMHSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

6.87%

+9.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.73%

14.21%

+13.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.20%

16.67%

+16.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.47%

17.26%

+18.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.82%

18.83%

+13.99%

SMH vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than SPEM's 2.49% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF		2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

SMH and SPEM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to SPEM (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 9.63% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.11% for SPEM.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer