SMH vs. SGRT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund. SMH is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

SMH vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than SGRT's 44.22% return.

SMH

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 11.44%
• YTD: 72.15%
• 6M: 75.62%
• 1Y: 141.99%
• 3Y*: 60.05%
• 5Y*: 38.42%
• 10Y*: 37.49%

SGRT

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 2.76%
• YTD: 44.22%
• 6M: 48.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.15%	24.20%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	44.22%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and SGRT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

SMH vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMH	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.18	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.74	—	—

Drawdowns

SMH vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-17.87%	-67.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-4.78%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.04%	-3.24%	-37.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SMH	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.20%	34.85%	-1.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.47%	34.85%	+0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.82%	34.85%	-2.03%

SMH vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than SGRT's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and SGRT in my portfolio?

SMH and SGRT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SMH or SGRT?

On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or SGRT?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMH or SGRT?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between SMH and SGRT?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while SGRT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.59% for SGRT.