PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SMH vs. EFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SMH vs. EFV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for EFV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EFV.

Performance

SMH vs. EFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 10.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed EFV with an annualized return of 37.49%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.

SMH

1D
1.72%
1M
8.30%
YTD
72.15%
6M
75.62%
1Y
136.32%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
38.42%
10Y*
37.49%

EFV

1D
0.48%
1M
0.52%
YTD
10.56%
6M
12.39%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
21.79%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		72.15%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF		10.56%42.22%5.35%18.85%-5.22%11.08%-2.97%15.80%-14.67%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and EFV is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005

0.59

The correlation between SMH and EFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SMH vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SMH
EFV

Technology

100.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

-

6.5%

Communication Services

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.5%

Energy

-

6.8%

Financial Services

-

37.3%

Healthcare

-

7.4%

Industrials

-

9.6%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

5.7%

Technology

SMH
100.0%
EFV
3.2%

Basic Materials

SMH

-

EFV
6.5%

Communication Services

SMH

-

EFV
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SMH

-

EFV
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

SMH

-

EFV
9.5%

Energy

SMH

-

EFV
6.8%

Financial Services

SMH

-

EFV
37.3%

Healthcare

SMH

-

EFV
7.4%

Industrials

SMH

-

EFV
9.6%

Real Estate

SMH

-

EFV
2.7%

Utilities

SMH

-

EFV
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF

Often compared with SMH:
SMH vs. SOXXSMH vs. QQQSMH vs. VGTSMH vs. FSELXSMH vs. SPYSMH vs. SMHXSMH vs. XLK
Often compared with EFV:
EFV vs. VEAEFV vs. EFAVEFV vs. DFIVXEFV vs. FIVAEFV vs. VOOEFV vs. VTRIXEFV vs. SCHF

Return for Risk

SMH vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
EFV
EFV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SMHEFVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.13
1.90

+2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.26
2.65

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.34

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.18

2.55

+6.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.74

9.40

+24.34

SMH vs. EFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the EFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and EFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMH vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than EFV's maximum drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and EFV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SMHEFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.96%

-63.94%

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.93%

-10.90%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.74%

-13.72%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

-25.84%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

-43.16%

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-1.24%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.04%

-14.81%

-26.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.06%

2.96%

+1.10%

Volatility

SMH vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.62%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SMHEFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.25%

4.62%

+11.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.73%

11.98%

+15.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.20%

14.58%

+18.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.47%

16.02%

+19.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.82%

17.85%

+14.97%

SMH vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EFV's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than EFV's 3.76% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFV
iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF		3.76%4.16%4.66%4.36%4.17%4.07%2.42%4.62%4.56%3.56%3.28%3.59%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF		0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

SMH and EFV have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs EFV's -63.94%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 10.55% for EFV. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for EFV.

EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.39% for EFV.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMH and EFV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer