SMH vs. DES
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while DES is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SMH returned 37.49%/yr vs 8.59%/yr for DES. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DES.
Performance
SMH vs. DES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than DES's 20.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed DES with an annualized return of 37.49%, while DES has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 141.99%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
DES
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 20.48%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 31.80%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
SMH vs. DES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 20.48% | 0.25% | 9.93% | 16.50% | -10.96% | 26.51% | -4.26% | 20.26% | -12.85% | 8.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and DES is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SMH and DES has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SMH vs. DES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SMH
DES
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SMH
DES
Basic Materials
SMH
-
DES
Communication Services
SMH
-
DES
Consumer Cyclical
SMH
-
DES
Consumer Defensive
SMH
-
DES
Energy
SMH
-
DES
Financial Services
SMH
-
DES
Healthcare
SMH
-
DES
Industrials
SMH
-
DES
Real Estate
SMH
-
DES
Utilities
SMH
-
DES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMH vs. DES — Risk / Return Rank
SMH
DES
SMH vs. DES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMH | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.32 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.18 | 3.87 | +5.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.74 | 11.13 | +22.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMH vs. DES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than DES's maximum drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and DES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMH | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.96% | -65.48% | -19.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.93% | -7.64% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.74% | -25.16% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.30% | -25.16% | -20.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.30% | -45.65% | +0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | 0.00% | -2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.04% | -9.67% | -31.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | 2.66% | +1.40% |
Volatility
SMH vs. DES - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) at 4.28%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMH | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.25% | 4.28% | +11.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 10.97% | +16.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.20% | 16.48% | +16.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 19.58% | +15.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.82% | 21.97% | +10.85% |
SMH vs. DES - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DES's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMH vs. DES - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than DES's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.29% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMH and DES have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to DES (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs DES's -65.48%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 8.59% for DES. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while DES is Small Cap Blend Equities. SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.38% for DES.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMH and DES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer