SMH vs. BTCI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. SMH is passively managed, while BTCI is actively managed. Over the past year, SMH returned 136.32% vs -35.48% for BTCI. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

SMH vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 72.15% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -24.54% return.

SMH

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 8.30%
• YTD: 72.15%
• 6M: 75.62%
• 1Y: 136.32%
• 3Y*: 60.05%
• 5Y*: 38.42%
• 10Y*: 37.49%

BTCI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -18.18%
• YTD: -24.54%
• 6M: -26.48%
• 1Y: -35.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMH vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.15%	49.17%	-1.65%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-24.54%	-1.09%	26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and BTCI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.41

Return for Risk

SMH vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMH vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SMH	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.13	-0.90	+5.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	-1.22	+5.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	0.86	+0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.18	-0.75	+9.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	33.74	-1.36	+35.10

SMH vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 4.13, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SMH vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -84.96%, which is greater than BTCI's maximum drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	SMH	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.96%	-47.16%	-37.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.93%	-47.16%	+32.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.30%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-44.20%	+41.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.04%	-15.65%	-25.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.06%	26.15%	-22.09%

Volatility

SMH vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 16.25% compared to NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) at 11.27%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SMH	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.25%	11.27%	+4.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.73%	31.13%	-3.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.20%	39.43%	-6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.47%	40.27%	-4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.82%	40.27%	-7.45%

SMH vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

SMH vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than BTCI's 44.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	44.19%	36.46%	6.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SMH and BTCI in my portfolio?

SMH and BTCI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SMH or BTCI?

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to BTCI (11.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMH dropped -84.96% vs BTCI's -47.16%.

Which ETF is better, SMH or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 136.32% vs -35.48% for BTCI. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BTCI has been the lower-risk option at 11.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SMH or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 136.32% return vs -35.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SMH or BTCI?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SMH or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.19%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

What is the main difference between SMH and BTCI?

SMH is categorized as Semiconductors, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SMH and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.