PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMDV vs. FYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SMDV vs. FYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 25.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SMDV has underperformed FYX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while FYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.


SMDV

1D
0.19%
1M
2.67%
6M
13.08%
YTD
17.34%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
7.27%

FYX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.59%
6M
18.15%
YTD
25.04%
1Y
42.73%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SMDV vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
17.34%0.26%7.03%8.99%-5.90%18.98%-4.74%17.23%-0.58%4.63%
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
25.04%12.68%12.22%18.30%-18.41%27.43%19.48%21.32%-10.64%14.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SMDV and FYX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.84

The correlation between SMDV and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SMDV vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SMDV
FYX

Financial Services

32.8%
17.3%

Industrials

21.9%
16.6%

Utilities

15.7%
1.6%

Basic Materials

8.3%
4.5%

Real Estate

7.5%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
11.7%

Technology

2.5%
11.7%

Healthcare

1.6%
14.0%

Communication Services

1.1%
3.1%

Energy

-

5.7%

Financial Services

SMDV
32.8%
FYX
17.3%

Industrials

SMDV
21.9%
FYX
16.6%

Utilities

SMDV
15.7%
FYX
1.6%

Basic Materials

SMDV
8.3%
FYX
4.5%

Real Estate

SMDV
7.5%
FYX
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

SMDV
4.4%
FYX
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SMDV
4.1%
FYX
11.7%

Technology

SMDV
2.5%
FYX
11.7%

Healthcare

SMDV
1.6%
FYX
14.0%

Communication Services

SMDV
1.1%
FYX
3.1%

Energy

SMDV

-

FYX
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SMDV vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMDV
SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FYX
FYX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMDV vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SMDVFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.40

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

5.68

-3.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

18.41

-12.91

SMDV vs. FYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the FYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDV and FYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SMDV vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and FYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SMDVFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.12%

-61.80%

+27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-7.56%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.23%

-27.91%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

-27.91%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

-48.82%

+14.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-2.43%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-10.83%

+4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.33%

+0.84%

Volatility

SMDV vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) is 3.78%, while First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) has a volatility of 4.31%. This indicates that SMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SMDVFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.31%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

12.17%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.39%

18.23%

-2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.57%

21.91%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

24.15%

-3.43%

SMDV vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

SMDV vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison

SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than FYX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYX
First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
0.91%0.64%1.62%1.22%0.95%0.99%0.65%1.12%1.08%0.60%0.94%0.88%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.30%2.67%2.68%2.69%2.51%2.02%2.13%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.35%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SMDV and FYX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FYX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SMDV (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMDV dropped -34.12% vs FYX's -61.80%.

On 10-year performance, FYX leads with 12.45% vs 7.27% for SMDV. On fees, SMDV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYX has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 7.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMDV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.

SMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.91% for FYX.

SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index, while FYX tracks Nasdaq AlphaDEX Small Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SMDV and 0.63% for FYX.

FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SMDV and FYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer