SMCY vs. BABX
SMCY (YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF) and BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCY returned -51.14% vs -20.22% for BABX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCY charges 1.01%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BABX.
Performance
SMCY vs. BABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -18.90% return, which is significantly higher than BABX's -43.40% return.
SMCY
- 1D
- -8.17%
- 1M
- -11.52%
- 6M
- -20.55%
- YTD
- -18.90%
- 1Y
- -51.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 9.27%
- 6M
- -57.47%
- YTD
- -43.40%
- 1Y
- -20.22%
- 3Y*
- -4.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCY vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | -18.90% | -15.41% | -33.36% |
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -43.40% | 123.85% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCY and BABX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCY vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank
SMCY
BABX
SMCY vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.03 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.26 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -0.46 | -0.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCY vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, smaller than the maximum BABX drawdown of -78.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and BABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.75% | -78.83% | +14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.43% | -78.83% | +18.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -78.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.90% | -68.05% | +7.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -46.10% | +8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.45% | 43.60% | -5.15% |
Volatility
SMCY vs. BABX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) is 22.60%, while GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) has a volatility of 28.33%. This indicates that SMCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.60% | 28.33% | -5.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.51% | 57.90% | +10.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.94% | 89.18% | -16.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.08% | 83.40% | -3.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.08% | 83.40% | -3.32% |
SMCY vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than BABX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCY vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison
SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 233.75%, while BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | 233.75% | 231.43% | 38.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCY and BABX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BABX has higher volatility (28.33%) compared to SMCY (22.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCY dropped -64.75% vs BABX's -78.83%.
On 1-year performance, BABX leads with -20.22% vs -51.14% for SMCY. On fees, SMCY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SMCY has been the lower-risk option at 22.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BABX has performed better with a -20.22% return vs -51.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 233.75%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
SMCY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BABX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for SMCY and 1.15% for BABX.
BABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCY and BABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer