SMCY vs. BABX
SMCY (YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF) and BABX (GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SMCY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BABX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SMCY returned -33.89% vs -46.50% for BABX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SMCY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for BABX.
Performance
SMCY vs. BABX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMCY achieves a -2.36% return, which is significantly higher than BABX's -62.26% return.
SMCY
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -14.96%
- YTD
- -2.36%
- 6M
- -5.19%
- 1Y
- -33.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BABX
- 1D
- -9.39%
- 1M
- -46.14%
- YTD
- -62.26%
- 6M
- -64.11%
- 1Y
- -46.50%
- 3Y*
- -12.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCY vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.36% | -15.41% | -33.36% |
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | -62.26% | 123.85% | -7.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SMCY and BABX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SMCY vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank
SMCY
BABX
SMCY vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SMCY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.95 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | -0.59 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | -1.16 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SMCY vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMCY drawdown since its inception was -64.75%, smaller than the maximum BABX drawdown of -78.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCY and BABX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SMCY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.75% | -78.70% | +13.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.43% | -78.70% | +18.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -78.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.93% | -78.70% | +25.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -45.65% | +8.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.46% | 40.00% | -3.54% |
Volatility
SMCY vs. BABX - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF (SMCY) has a higher volatility of 41.21% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX) at 17.69%. This indicates that SMCY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SMCY | BABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.21% | 17.69% | +23.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.11% | 59.13% | +7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.15% | 88.11% | -15.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.50% | 82.97% | -2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.50% | 82.97% | -2.47% |
SMCY vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMCY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than BABX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SMCY vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison
SMCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 211.43%, while BABX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BABX GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCY YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF | 211.43% | 231.43% | 38.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SMCY and BABX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCY has higher volatility (41.21%) compared to BABX (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SMCY dropped -64.75% vs BABX's -78.70%.
On 1-year performance, SMCY leads with -33.89% vs -46.50% for BABX. On fees, SMCY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BABX has been the lower-risk option at 17.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMCY has performed better with a -33.89% return vs -46.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.
SMCY has the higher dividend yield at 211.43%, compared with 0.00% for BABX.
SMCY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BABX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for SMCY and 1.15% for BABX.
SMCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SMCY and BABX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer