PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMCP vs. QQQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMCP vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMCP vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


SMCP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQS

1D
0.62%
1M
-2.36%
YTD
1.41%
6M
3.54%
1Y
50.17%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMCP vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMCP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMCP vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMCP

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMCP vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SMCP vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMCPQQQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

Dividends

SMCP vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.


TTM2025202420232022
SMCP
AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
3.43%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%

Drawdowns

SMCP vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMCP drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum QQQS drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMCP and QQQS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMCPQQQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-38.06%

+38.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.24%

+7.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.82%

+13.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

Volatility

SMCP vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMCPQQQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

30.75%

-30.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

28.40%

-28.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

28.40%

-28.40%